People in every state struggle to exercise economic and political control over their lives.
The Power Scorecard is designed to assess economic, civic, and political conditions across all 50 states, creating a ranking rubric with an optimal score of 120. Our analysis shows that even the highest scoring states achieve less than half the optimal score across economic, civic, and political conditions for power. Poor overall conditions are often most acute in the South and Midwest, with high performing states dispersed across the country. To see this phenomenon, explore the aggregate conditions on the interactive map and chart.
Economic, civic, and political conditions of power generally correlate.
The Power Scorecard tests Dēmos, hypothesis that economic and political power are linked. Our findings provide evidence that economic and political indicators are interconnected, demonstrated through both the highest (top 10) and lowest (bottom 10) performing states achieving similar outcomes for economic, civic, and political conditions. Explore aggregate conditions to see how these conditions correlate.
Economic security is not a guarantee of economic mobility.
While often conflated, or seen interchangeably, the Power Scorecard reaffirms that different conditions shape the outcome for economic security and mobility. We found that weaker conditions for economic security impede conditions for upward economic mobility. Stronger conditions for economic security, however, do not guarantee economic mobility. Explore economic conditions on the interactive map or chart for more.
Strong civic conditions are not enough to drive democratic participation.
The correlation between civic vitality, defined by Dēmos as the ability to live freely and develop connection to one’s place of life, and democratic vitality, the ability to engage in our political process, is weak. Our findings suggest that civic power conditions are not enough on their own to drive democratic participation. The Scorecard shows that many states are failing to ensure that all basic liberties central to vitality are afforded to the people within their states.
Publicly available data limits the ability to perform substantial analysis across race, ethnicity and class. All are necessary for sophisticated, quality analysis.
The Scorecard aggregates a range of data from primarily publicly available sources, yielding powerful insights on the disempowerment of marginalized communities who are predominantly people of color. However, racially disaggregated data are available for only a subset of metrics, allowing only a partial racial equity analysis. Significant data gaps exist for American Indian/Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, and Native Hawaiian populations, and serve as a call to action for better, more inclusive data collection and a greater availability of disaggregated data in the future.